|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2022 18:41:11 GMT -5
I've just finished re-reading Long Shadows, and I've revised my opinion about Ashfur. I used to think he was a well-written villain (at least by Warriors standards), but the longer I think about him the more he makes less sense as a character. In Long Shadows, he makes it VERY clear that he wants to get revenge on Squirrelflight for rejecting him. He wants to hurt her in any way he can. In TBC, he no longer wants to hurt her, he wants to be with her and seems almost in denial about her wanting to be with him. This is a huge turn in his mental process, and it isn't explained at all. It's easy to say "oh, Ashfur's just unhinged and obsessive," but I think they should have shown at least one moment where his thought process shifts from wanting to hurt her to wanting to get with her.
His arc would have made WAY more sense if his obsession was getting Squirrelflight back at all costs all along: 1. Squirrelflight rejects him in favor of Brambleclaw 2. Ashfur has a "nice guy" mentality. He is sure that Squirrelflight chose wrong, so he devises ways to make Brambleclaw look bad so she will "realize her mistake" and go back to him 3. Ashfur realizes that Brambleclaw and Hawkfrost are working together. He helps set the trap for Firestar. He sends for Squirrelflight so that she will see Brambleclaw try to murder Firestar and break up with him as a result. He plans to fight Brambleclaw and be Firestar's hero, thus winning Squirrelflight's love. 4. Ashfur somehow guesses that Jay, Holly, and Lion are not Squirrelflight's kits. He confronts her about it during the fire scene, threatening to expose her secret to Brambleclaw so Brambleclaw will leave her. Squirrelflight admits the truth, hoping that by agreeing with him he will stop talking and save Jay, Holly, and Lion. He also plans to defend Squirrelflight against any backlash, delusionally thinking that she will choose him if he sticks up for her. 5. He is murdered by a distraught Hollyleaf, but goes to StarClan. He never confesses to Squirrelflight about his role in trying to kill her father (knowing that this confession would turn her against him). StarClan doesn't connect the dots to his role in trapping Firestar and lets him in. 6. He later becomes the imposter to gain access to Squirrelflight, delusionally confident that when his secret is revealed, she will realize that she loved imposter Bramblestar (himself) more than real Bramblestar and become his mate.
|
|
|
Post by Saint Ambrosef on Jan 21, 2022 18:54:14 GMT -5
I kinda agree. I never had much problem with Ashfur being a villain (although I personally thought bringing him back was dumb); for me, the issue is that he felt so one-dimensional in the recent arc. He lacked the necessary depth for his characterization to feel believable. Although, tbf, Warriors is not known for its exceptionally compelling villains.
I'm not entirely sure why it seems that way to me -- I'd need more time to think it over to thoroughly articulate my feelings. I've never waded very far into Ashfur debates before, so I'd need to go back and re-read his scenes.
|
|
Cloudstorm
Don’t let it kill you. Even when it hurts like hell.
|
Post by Cloudstorm on Jan 21, 2022 19:09:43 GMT -5
Quill that’s primarily due to him never being intended to have much overarching plot significance or intended to be a lasting villain at all. He was merely picked at random to become part the love triangle subplot and was meant to be a one-off antagonist that plotted( Ha! I use the word ironically, because let’s be honest he never truly plotted anything) that revenge against his girlfriend over the heartache and grief she caused him when she broke up with him, never some maniacal, unhinged and obsessive Incel like what they did to him in TBC. Which is largely why he comes off so one-dimensional and flat, plus with TBC basically being the writing teams response to the fandom outcry from him being placed in Starclan by Vicky. He was never intended to some complex villain that was obsessive, abusive or possessive or manipulating morally unjust sociopath like Mapleshade for instance. He was just meant to be a grief-stricken, resentful Ex that went off his rocker for a spell to seek vengeance, not some calculated Serial Killer, being as he doesn’t plot anything when it comes to getting revenge on Squirrelflight, he’s an opportunistic feeder, that simply took advantage of naturally occurring situations and natural disasters. Heck he wasn’t even chosen or written specifically to fit the love triangle role, Victoria just chose him at random, and went with it.
|
|
|
Post by ᏞᎪᎠᎽ Ꮎf fᎪᏁᎠᎾms ミ☆ on Jan 21, 2022 19:22:47 GMT -5
i've been saying for ages ashfur is a poorly written villain. his motivations in TBC make absolutely no sense and it's a giant leap in logic to go from targeting one cat, to suddenly targeting the entire socieital structure they all live in...like wtf no. ashfur never gave a crap about the code when he was alive, so why would he come back in an arc titled "the broken code"? i could go on and on about how much i hate ashfur being in TBC.
|
|
|
Post by vectoring34 on Jan 21, 2022 19:49:46 GMT -5
i've been saying for ages ashfur is a poorly written villain. his motivations in TBC make absolutely no sense and it's a giant leap in logic to go from targeting one cat, to suddenly targeting the entire socieital structure they all live in...like wtf no. ashfur never gave a crap about the code when he was alive, so why would he come back in an arc titled "the broken code"? i could go on and on about how much i hate ashfur being in TBC. He didn't care about the societal structure in TBC either, he explicitly states as such multiple times and then other characters hammer it in further that he was just doing it to further his control of Squirrelflight and mess with her while they were busy chasing their own tails. When I read the books, I almost thought they were emphasizing too hard that they were just collateral damage to him, but then I see comments like this and I realize that apparently they didn't emphasize it enough.
|
|
|
Post by Skypaw13 on Jan 21, 2022 21:18:02 GMT -5
Quill that’s primarily due to him never being intended to have much overarching plot significance or intended to be a lasting villain at all. He was merely picked at random to become part the love triangle subplot and was meant to be a one-off antagonist that plotted( Ha! I use the word ironically, because let’s be honest he never truly plotted anything) that revenge against his girlfriend over the heartache and grief she caused him when she broke up with him, n ever some maniacal, unhinged and obsessive Incel like what they did to him in TBC. Which is largely why he comes off so one-dimensional and flat, plus with TBC basically being the writing teams response to the fandom outcry from him being placed in Starclan by Vicky. He was never intended to some complex villain that was obsessive, abusive or possessive or manipulating morally unjust sociopath like Mapleshade for instance. He was just meant to be a grief-stricken, resentful Ex that went off his rocker for a spell to seek vengeance, not some calculated Serial Killer, being as he doesn’t plot anything when it comes to getting revenge on Squirrelflight, he’s an opportunistic feeder, that simply took advantage of naturally occurring situations and natural disasters. Heck he wasn’t even chosen or written specifically to fit the love triangle role, Victoria just chose him at random, and went with it. Is trying to kill your ex and her three children not indicative of a maniacal, unhinged, obsessive incel? Asking for a friend. Listen, I don't like Ashfur being the main TBC villain either (would have preferred they choose someone a lot more relevant to the Code discussion), but saying he wasn't crazed and obsessive during Po3 is a new one for me, chief.
|
|
|
Post by ᏞᎪᎠᎽ Ꮎf fᎪᏁᎠᎾms ミ☆ on Jan 21, 2022 21:25:57 GMT -5
i've been saying for ages ashfur is a poorly written villain. his motivations in TBC make absolutely no sense and it's a giant leap in logic to go from targeting one cat, to suddenly targeting the entire socieital structure they all live in...like wtf no. ashfur never gave a crap about the code when he was alive, so why would he come back in an arc titled "the broken code"? i could go on and on about how much i hate ashfur being in TBC. He didn't care about the societal structure in TBC either, he explicitly states as such multiple times and then other characters hammer it in further that he was just doing it to further his control of Squirrelflight and mess with her while they were busy chasing their own tails. When I read the books, I almost thought they were emphasizing too hard that they were just collateral damage to him, but then I see comments like this and I realize that apparently they didn't emphasize it enough. see i get what u're trying to say, but it still doesnt make any sense to me. i dont think it ever will. just because characters say stuff, it doesnt make it make sense on a foundation level to me personally. but this is all broken record stuff from me because i've been saying TBC and ashfur suck since the beginning so im biased anyways lmao
|
|
Cloudstorm
Don’t let it kill you. Even when it hurts like hell.
|
Post by Cloudstorm on Jan 21, 2022 23:18:15 GMT -5
Quill that’s primarily due to him never being intended to have much overarching plot significance or intended to be a lasting villain at all. He was merely picked at random to become part the love triangle subplot and was meant to be a one-off antagonist that plotted( Ha! I use the word ironically, because let’s be honest he never truly plotted anything) that revenge against his girlfriend over the heartache and grief she caused him when she broke up with him, n ever some maniacal, unhinged and obsessive Incel like what they did to him in TBC. Which is largely why he comes off so one-dimensional and flat, plus with TBC basically being the writing teams response to the fandom outcry from him being placed in Starclan by Vicky. He was never intended to some complex villain that was obsessive, abusive or possessive or manipulating morally unjust sociopath like Mapleshade for instance. He was just meant to be a grief-stricken, resentful Ex that went off his rocker for a spell to seek vengeance, not some calculated Serial Killer, being as he doesn’t plot anything when it comes to getting revenge on Squirrelflight, he’s an opportunistic feeder, that simply took advantage of naturally occurring situations and natural disasters. Heck he wasn’t even chosen or written specifically to fit the love triangle role, Victoria just chose him at random, and went with it. Is trying to kill your ex and her three children not indicative of a maniacal, unhinged, obsessive incel? Asking for a friend. Listen, I don't like Ashfur being the main TBC villain either (would have preferred they choose someone a lot more relevant to the Code discussion), but saying he wasn't crazed and obsessive during Po3 is a new one for me, chief. don’t get me wrong, his actions are indeed disgusting and heinous, and he definitely became crazed for sure. to try to explain more clearly since I might of missed the mark in my first post, to shed light on my personal opinion . What I meant is that his actions are more driven by circumstantial incidents as opposed to him inherently having a obsessive, sociopathic, psychologically deranged manipulative etc type disposition imo( like we see in TBC). His actions are more derived imo from grief, heartache and bitterness from Squirrelflight basically using him, albeit unintentional, but considering how the entire scenario plays out, it’s easy to understand how Ashfur or anyone really would feel that way, and obviously he held onto that resentment, bitterness, hatred and begrudge for Squirrelflight and eventually snapped and took advantage of an opportune situation to get retribution for all the Anguish and bereavement that he blames her for being responsible for. Now don’t misconstrue this as me defending, justifying or excusing any of his horrible transgressions, just giving a different interpretative angle to his motivations and what drove him to make his choices. now maybe I’m being a little too lenient on him or giving him more credit then some people would deem him deserving of, and they may be right. And I know most people tag him as an incel, which in context of TBC I’d agree. But in context of the rest of his character in the other 3 arcs he shows up in, I find it kinda dubious, since incels are generally very resentful towards all women and are very misogynistic, and express cynicism and begrudging of other Males in relationships, which isn’t present iirc, as I don’t remember anytime Ashfur acted out hatefully towards other She-cats or other Toms that had mates, all his animosity is directed at Squirrelflight mostly, and her kits ofc which he sees as a device to hurt her. And just as an FYI I’m not saying that his actions/behavior etc aren’t indicative of a maniacal, unhinged sociopath. Just that it’s not the only possibility or interpretation, and that I personally just don’t view it in that perspective, but it’s perfectly valid for people to associate that with his character.
|
|
|
Post by 𝐛𝐥𝟒𝐜𝐤𝐬𝐨𝐥 on Jan 22, 2022 3:23:44 GMT -5
I think he is a great villain because his motivations and intentions are clear. Squirrelflight left him which left him heartbroken. He wanted to hurt Squirrelflight as much as possible for leaving him, but while still being a mentally unstable and obsessed person, he still expected Squirrelflight to be with him when Bramblestar was out of the way. It's great. It's different. It's interesting. He is such a scary villain and I adored every moment of him, especially in TBC.
|
|
|
Post by Skypaw13 on Jan 22, 2022 5:43:40 GMT -5
Is trying to kill your ex and her three children not indicative of a maniacal, unhinged, obsessive incel? Asking for a friend. Listen, I don't like Ashfur being the main TBC villain either (would have preferred they choose someone a lot more relevant to the Code discussion), but saying he wasn't crazed and obsessive during Po3 is a new one for me, chief. don’t get me wrong, his actions are indeed disgusting and heinous, and he definitely became crazed for sure. to try to explain more clearly since I might of missed the mark in my first post, to shed light on my personal opinion . What I meant is that his actions are more driven by circumstantial incidents as opposed to him inherently having a obsessive, sociopathic, psychologically deranged manipulative etc type disposition imo( like we see in TBC). His actions are more derived imo from grief, heartache and bitterness from Squirrelflight basically using him, albeit unintentional, but considering how the entire scenario plays out, it’s easy to understand how Ashfur or anyone really would feel that way, and obviously he held onto that resentment, bitterness, hatred and begrudge for Squirrelflight and eventually snapped and took advantage of an opportune situation to get retribution for all the Anguish and bereavement that he blames her for being responsible for. Now don’t misconstrue this as me defending, justifying or excusing any of his horrible transgressions, just giving a different interpretative angle to his motivations and what drove him to make his choices. now maybe I’m being a little too lenient on him or giving him more credit then some people would deem him deserving of, and they may be right. And I know most people tag him as an incel, which in context of TBC I’d agree. But in context of the rest of his character in the other 3 arcs he shows up in, I find it kinda dubious, since incels are generally very resentful towards all women and are very misogynistic, and express cynicism and begrudging of other Males in relationships, which isn’t present iirc, as I don’t remember anytime Ashfur acted out hatefully towards other She-cats or other Toms that had mates, all his animosity is directed at Squirrelflight mostly, and her kits ofc which he sees as a device to hurt her. And just as an FYI I’m not saying that his actions/behavior etc aren’t indicative of a maniacal, unhinged sociopath. Just that it’s not the only possibility or interpretation, and that I personally just don’t view it in that perspective, but it’s perfectly valid for people to associate that with his character. That's all fair. I feel like the way you're wording things is getting dangerously close to the whole "if Squirrelflight hadn't rejected him, he'd be fine" argument, which is a yikes take. But I don't think that's what you're actually trying to say, just something to be aware of. The rest of this post seems logical enough, even if we disagree on what "incel" means (I think I was using a much broader definition than you). idk man my brain isn't really working right now, sorry
|
|
|
Post by Saint Ambrosef on Jan 22, 2022 9:53:08 GMT -5
Why is this thread anchored?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2022 10:40:11 GMT -5
Why is this thread anchored? I'm not sure. What does it mean when a thread is anchored?
|
|
|
Post by Saint Ambrosef on Jan 22, 2022 11:01:14 GMT -5
Why is this thread anchored? I'm not sure. What does it mean when a thread is anchored? New posts will not bump the thread back to the top of the board. So you can continue posting on it unlike a locked thread, but it will slowly disappear from the main page. Mods sometimes do this for controversial threads when a fight breaks out, although everyone here has been pretty civil from what I've seen.
|
|
|
Post by kells on Jan 22, 2022 11:38:25 GMT -5
I haven't read ALitM yet, but from what I've seen so far from TBC Ashfur is practically Tigerstar 2.0 in terms of attitude. In PoT his goals were borderline singular, and all this manipulation mastery of his never existed. A common argument for the codebreaker plot was that he did it to throw suspicion off of him as he went to attack Squirrelflight's kin. If that's so, why be a complete dumbass, acting like some kind of rabid animal to your own Clanmates? You'd think someone with the smarts to manipulate all Clans would have the brain cells to not blow his cover this badly, but no. Even in PoT it was shown Ashfur tried to hide his anger sometimes, but in TBc he just acts like some brute who isn't trying to keep the Clans' trust in him at least long enough eliminate Squirrelflight's kin.
I'm not even going to step into the major powercreep that is his "powers". It was already strange enough that this bozo is the one to block out StarClan and not anyone else in history and manipulate entire Clans despite having none skill shown at all in the previous arcs, but then he has the ability to manipulate ghost cat armies? I remember hearing somewhere that this was never explained in the last book and if that's true, then yeesh.
|
|
|
Post by Redstorm on Jan 22, 2022 12:49:31 GMT -5
I wish there was at least some exploration during TBC that he was murdered by Hollyleaf. And it was hidden by other cats that are hero worshipped and probably regarded as exemplary in warrior code behavior.
His whole warrior code enforcing could be a critique of how the code applies to some but not others. It happens to be that the main characters get away with breaking the code. Perhaps Ashfur could be a deconstruction of side character anger at main characters (though he's still a terrible cat). I still think the main exploration of him and Squirrelflight makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by halogen on Jan 22, 2022 13:46:59 GMT -5
I don't think his obsession with getting Squirrelflight back and also wanting to hurt her is unrealistic, it seems very sadly realistic that someone obsessed with someone they rejected could simultaneously want to punish them and delusionally hope they will get that person back.
That said, I do think it to be random and implausible for him to decide he wants to make everyone follow the code as a cover for his revenge, why the code exactly? As people had said earlier, it issn't in-character for him to make some 10-step plan with lots of subterfuge to disguise him going after Squirrelflight rather than just possess Bramblestar and go after him directly. And how he acts hypocritically (kicking the elders out, appointing deputies without apprentices) makes it unbelievable that cats follow him out of genuine devotion to the code and believing they need to follow it to get StarClan back, instead of just disagreeing with him but feeling they must follow him because the leader's word is the code (which misses the point since the plot is supposed to criticize the cats' strict following of the code in general, not just the leader law). In general I hate stories where a moral issue is presented but then it turns out one side of the issue doesn't even believe in what they are preaching, it feels like it sidesteps the drama. I think the plot would have been better served if he was part of an overall movement in StarClan to punish codebreakers, the rest of whom legitimately believed in the cause (this would fit with StarClan suddenly being so harsh on Squirrelflight and Leafpool, and Juniperclaw being sent to the DF even though he tried to redeem himself). Maybe there's a conflict within StarClan and the strict group is collectively responsible for shutting down contact with StarClan both to show their disapproval and make sure the rest of StarClan doesn't stop them. Ashfur joins the movement early to try to show himself as redeemed and so he doesn't get targeted himself, and the possession is agreed on by all of these cats. The events of the later books could still play out with Ashfur going rogue using his presence in the physical world to double-cross the rest of the group and go on with his own plan to punish Squirrelflight and her family and be with Squirrelflight, and the rest of the StarClan cats realize how what they have done had allowed things to come to this.
I have mixed feelings on him in TBC overall - there are some times where his portrayal totally gets at the obsession and twisted perspective, like when he says he thinks him defying death to find Squirrelflight means she should love him. But then there are times where he just seems like an unrealistic cartoon villain, when he's going "I am going to make them all pay, all of the Clans, all of StarClan!" even though he is supposed to have only had a grudge against Squirrelflight (and Hollyleaf, though they don't talk about that) and it's not really explained why he would want to punish everyone else too.
|
|
Cloudstorm
Don’t let it kill you. Even when it hurts like hell.
|
Post by Cloudstorm on Jan 22, 2022 15:23:45 GMT -5
Skypaw13 Said
Oh hell no, yeah don’t misinterpret it as me saying “If Squirrelflight hadn’t rejected him, everything would of been hunky-dory” because I don’t support that take 1 bit. Just pointing out that his actions aren’t attributed to him being some psychologically deranged, or mentally disturbed sociopath, or some unhinged serial killer. Since prior to TBC his character doesn’t support it. He’s not inherently some malicious, and calculated and decisive murderer that meticulously plans out subterfuge and malevolent acts like it’s his passion project. He mostly was a normal warrior that was unable to control his anger and other negative emotions associated with heartbreak and grief, and eventually after allowing them to fester long enough they overwhelmed him until he just “SNAPPED” and seized a opportunity to get retaliation. And Squirrelflight is certainly not responsible or accountable for his actions, neither should she feel burdened to think so, just that from Ashfur’s perspective it’s easy to see the logic behind why he would feel used by Squirrelflight surrounding the whole ordeal, with her getting flirtatious with him very soon after her initial breakup with Brambleclaw, then dumping him right after she starts patching things back together with Brambleclaw, and when Ashfur undoubtedly feels they were starting to develop a deeper connection.
However, Ashfur is entirely responsible for letting his hatred fester and root itself so deeply, and subsequent transgressions and heinous acts the follow because of it, just that imho there’s logical reasoning for why he was compelled to do so because of intense grief, albeit a much more substantial and darker response then what’s usual. But grief hits everyone differently, so it’s not illogical.
and yeah incel is a broad term with several types, and I was referring heavily to the “Loser” Incel type, as that fits his description the most in TBC and mirrors the fandom consensus the most accurate when people refer to him as an Incel imo.
|
|
|
Post by tema on Jan 22, 2022 15:41:19 GMT -5
I've just finished re-reading Long Shadows, and I've revised my opinion about Ashfur. I used to think he was a well-written villain (at least by Warriors standards), but the longer I think about him the more he makes less sense as a character. In Long Shadows, he makes it VERY clear that he wants to get revenge on Squirrelflight for rejecting him. He wants to hurt her in any way he can. In TBC, he no longer wants to hurt her, he wants to be with her and seems almost in denial about her wanting to be with him. This is a huge turn in his mental process, and it isn't explained at all. (...) 3. Ashfur realizes that Brambleclaw and Hawkfrost are working together. He helps set the trap for Firestar. He sends for Squirrelflight so that she will see Brambleclaw try to murder Firestar and break up with him as a result. He plans to fight Brambleclaw and be Firestar's hero, thus winning Squirrelflight's love. 4. Ashfur somehow guesses that Jay, Holly, and Lion are not Squirrelflight's kits. He confronts her about it during the fire scene, threatening to expose her secret to Brambleclaw so Brambleclaw will leave her. Squirrelflight admits the truth, hoping that by agreeing with him he will stop talking and save Jay, Holly, and Lion. He also plans to defend Squirrelflight against any backlash, delusionally thinking that she will choose him if he sticks up for her. I thought the whole attitude change in tPoT was just him being all "sour grapes." Anyway, point 3 could easily be explained if Hawkfrost initiated the contact between the two as he had done to Mudclaw. Point 4... I haven't read that part in a while, but did he really know about the kids, or was he 'playing by ear' from Squirrelflight's reveal? Quill that’s primarily due to him never being intended to have much overarching plot significance or intended to be a lasting villain at all. He was merely picked at random to become part the love triangle subplot and was meant to be a one-off antagonist that plotted( Ha! I use the word ironically, because let’s be honest he never truly plotted anything) that revenge against his girlfriend over the heartache and grief she caused him when she broke up with him, n ever some maniacal, unhinged and obsessive Incel like what they did to him in TBC. Which is largely why he comes off so one-dimensional and flat, plus with TBC basically being the writing teams response to the fandom outcry from him being placed in Starclan by Vicky. He was never intended to some complex villain that was obsessive, abusive or possessive or manipulating morally unjust sociopath like Mapleshade for instance. He was just meant to be a grief-stricken, resentful Ex that went off his rocker for a spell to seek vengeance, not some calculated Serial Killer, being as he doesn’t plot anything when it comes to getting revenge on Squirrelflight, he’s an opportunistic feeder, that simply took advantage of naturally occurring situations and natural disasters. Heck he wasn’t even chosen or written specifically to fit the love triangle role, Victoria just chose him at random, and went with it. Is trying to kill your ex and her three children not indicative of a maniacal, unhinged, obsessive incel? Asking for a friend. Listen, I don't like Ashfur being the main TBC villain either (would have preferred they choose someone a lot more relevant to the Code discussion), but saying he wasn't crazed and obsessive during Po3 is a new one for me, chief. I think it's very dangerous behavior to lump together "psychotic" together with "incel." There is overlap between the two, sure, but to imply that every guy out there who can't get a woman is going to go on a murderous spree is almost bullying. More importantly, through inversion it spreads the stereotype that men in relationships are inherently better people that are less likely to act psychologically harmful to their partners. Plenty of domestic abuse cases would argue against that impression.
|
|
|
Post by vectoring34 on Jan 22, 2022 19:55:19 GMT -5
I don't think his obsession with getting Squirrelflight back and also wanting to hurt her is unrealistic, it seems very sadly realistic that someone obsessed with someone they rejected could simultaneously want to punish them and delusionally hope they will get that person back. That said, I do think it to be random and implausible for him to decide he wants to make everyone follow the code as a cover for his revenge, why the code exactly? As people had said earlier, it issn't in-character for him to make some 10-step plan with lots of subterfuge to disguise him going after Squirrelflight rather than just possess Bramblestar and go after him directly. And how he acts hypocritically (kicking the elders out, appointing deputies without apprentices) makes it unbelievable that cats follow him out of genuine devotion to the code and believing they need to follow it to get StarClan back, instead of just disagreeing with him but feeling they must follow him because the leader's word is the code (which misses the point since the plot is supposed to criticize the cats' strict following of the code in general, not just the leader law). In general I hate stories where a moral issue is presented but then it turns out one side of the issue doesn't even believe in what they are preaching, it feels like it sidesteps the drama. I think the plot would have been better served if he was part of an overall movement in StarClan to punish codebreakers, the rest of whom legitimately believed in the cause (this would fit with StarClan suddenly being so harsh on Squirrelflight and Leafpool, and Juniperclaw being sent to the DF even though he tried to redeem himself). Maybe there's a conflict within StarClan and the strict group is collectively responsible for shutting down contact with StarClan both to show their disapproval and make sure the rest of StarClan doesn't stop them. Ashfur joins the movement early to try to show himself as redeemed and so he doesn't get targeted himself, and the possession is agreed on by all of these cats. The events of the later books could still play out with Ashfur going rogue using his presence in the physical world to double-cross the rest of the group and go on with his own plan to punish Squirrelflight and her family and be with Squirrelflight, and the rest of the StarClan cats realize how what they have done had allowed things to come to this. I have mixed feelings on him in TBC overall - there are some times where his portrayal totally gets at the obsession and twisted perspective, like when he says he thinks him defying death to find Squirrelflight means she should love him. But then there are times where he just seems like an unrealistic cartoon villain, when he's going "I am going to make them all pay, all of the Clans, all of StarClan!" even though he is supposed to have only had a grudge against Squirrelflight (and Hollyleaf, though they don't talk about that) and it's not really explained why he would want to punish everyone else too. Bitter people often end up wanting to blame the whole world provided they stew long enough, that's not particularly odd. His whole spiel just reads like the rambling and nonsensical manifestos of any given mass killer except that he has the power to actually accomplish it. In that regard, I don't think his actions are particularly odd. He's hurt and lashing out because he's upset at the world for not being on his side about this, something he clearly feels entitled to. When he is eventually pushed to the point that he'd want to see everything be destroyed, again, unfortunately you can find that attitude in someone who's going to go for the murder suicide too. As far as his specific modifications to the code, he didn't just blurt them all out on the spot either. To me a good chunk of it felt like it was on the fly planning by him in order to try to lovebomb Squirrelflight (letting himself and her eat first) or else because he was paranoid and needed reliable information (the deputy thing).
|
|
|
Post by whiteflight on Jan 22, 2022 20:59:01 GMT -5
I think before TBC he was an alright villain but since I'm still annoyed/mad that he was the villain for TBC I won't say much since I didn't read TBC but I hate how he got special powers and didn't get killed by either Squrrielflight or Bramblestar since I would have liked it if they were the ones to kill him.
|
|
|
Post by Skypaw13 on Jan 23, 2022 0:15:56 GMT -5
Is trying to kill your ex and her three children not indicative of a maniacal, unhinged, obsessive incel? Asking for a friend. Listen, I don't like Ashfur being the main TBC villain either (would have preferred they choose someone a lot more relevant to the Code discussion), but saying he wasn't crazed and obsessive during Po3 is a new one for me, chief. I think it's very dangerous behavior to lump together "psychotic" together with "incel." There is overlap between the two, sure, but to imply that every guy out there who can't get a woman is going to go on a murderous spree is almost bullying. More importantly, through inversion it spreads the stereotype that men in relationships are inherently better people that are less likely to act psychologically harmful to their partners. Plenty of domestic abuse cases would argue against that impression. Polite request to stop twisting people's words, please and thank you
|
|
|
Post by tema on Jan 23, 2022 13:54:12 GMT -5
I think it's very dangerous behavior to lump together "psychotic" together with "incel." There is overlap between the two, sure, but to imply that every guy out there who can't get a woman is going to go on a murderous spree is almost bullying. More importantly, through inversion it spreads the stereotype that men in relationships are inherently better people that are less likely to act psychologically harmful to their partners. Plenty of domestic abuse cases would argue against that impression. Polite request to stop twisting people's words, please and thank you No need to be hostile. I'm just highlighting an implication.
|
|