|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2018 12:48:27 GMT -5
People talk about Mudclaw's involvement in the rebellion and debate whether that mean he deserves Starclan or not. However, let's switch the tide, shall we? What's your guys option on Onestar's involvement in it and the whole situation in general?
Do you think it's clear cut, where Onestar is innocent while Mudclaw is guilty? Or do you think it's more grey, where Onestar and Mudclaw are just as bad as each other? Or something inbetween even that- With Mudclaw being the worse out of the two, but Onestar still not totally being innocent himself?
Do you think it's fair Mudclaw should be called/signaled out for the rebellion, even considered to the Dark Forest. While Onewhisker barely ever gets called out for it? What if Onewhisker had been the one to crashed by the tree? (That wasn't Starclan, confirmed by Vicky. It was a complete accident.)
Final question, what label do you think is more accurate to the situation: 'Windclan Civil War' or 'Mudclaw's Rebellion'? I'd just like to point out, both sides were fighting. And both sides got others Clans involved to fight for them. (Mudclaw - Riverclan/Shadowclan and Onewhisker - Thunderclan.)
|
|
|
Post by vectoring34 on Apr 27, 2018 14:15:14 GMT -5
Onestar had no fault to do with it. He had to deal with an angry, jealous Mudclaw who proceeded to find Riverclan and Shadowclan allies to help him lead a coup. He's 100% innocent in context of the rebellion (him being a jerk later doesn't change this!).
I do think it's fair that Mudclaw is the only one blamed for it because he is, in fact, the only one to blame for it. Hawkfrost helped, but Hawkfrost wouldn't have managed a thing if Mudclaw wasn't at the head of it. Calling out Onestar for it is absurd. It's like calling out Stonefur for being murdered by Tigerstar's goons. Onestar was nothing but a victim, there was nothing to call out there. BTW, people keep saying it was confirmed it wasn't Starclan but no one seems to actually know where this was said, so I'm not too convinced.
Mudclaw's rebellion is more accurate given how short lived it was. Also, your comparison is flawed in regards to getting help. Mudclaw knowingly conspired with other clans and promised them juicy favors like overthrowing their own leaders in exchange for helping him. Thunderclan just helped out because Mudclaw is upending order. One is plotting and scheming, one is just a reaction and honoring an alliance.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 27, 2018 14:28:47 GMT -5
Or or.....Onestar had no right to leadership in the first place, therefore Mudclaw was in the right to challenge him. On top of that Onestar practically had his head up ThunderCLan's butt since the start, so oh well if Mudclaw gets outside help too.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2018 14:31:18 GMT -5
Onestar had no fault to do with it. He had to deal with an angry, jealous Mudclaw who proceeded to find Riverclan and Shadowclan allies to help him lead a coup. He's 100% innocent in context of the rebellion (him being a jerk later doesn't change this!). I do think it's fair that Mudclaw is the only one blamed for it because he is, in fact, the only one to blame for it. Hawkfrost helped, but Hawkfrost wouldn't have managed a thing if Mudclaw wasn't at the head of it. Calling out Onestar for it is absurd. It's like calling out Stonefur for being murdered by Tigerstar's goons. Onestar was nothing but a victim, there was nothing to call out there. BTW, people keep saying it was confirmed it wasn't Starclan but no one seems to actually know where this was said, so I'm not too convinced. Mudclaw's rebellion is more accurate given how short lived it was. Also, your comparison is flawed in regards to getting help. Mudclaw knowingly conspired with other clans and promised them juicy favors like overthrowing their own leaders in exchange for helping him. Thunderclan just helped out because Mudclaw is upending order. One is plotting and scheming, one is just a reaction and honoring an alliance. You really don't like Mudclaw, do you? Care to enlight why? Also you can't deny that fact from ;Mudclaw's point of view, the three cats could of very easily been lying, as two Thunderclan cats and Onewhisker himself, cats who would only benefit. Serval of Windclan warriors wanted to him to become leader, so it wasn't done as solely selfishness. It's also unfair that Mudclaw be stripped of his usually rightfully title, something he's served seasons to earn, when he's done nothing wrong.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 27, 2018 14:37:32 GMT -5
Mudclaw unsurprisingly still has a good amount of hate thrown at him because people still think he's some mastermind villain. When it's already shown in canon that he's not and that Hawkfrost was manipulating him, then even tried to kill him when his plan unraveled to keep him quiet. People also ignore the fact that Tallstar's nightmare was just a dream, not an omen, that in it wasn't even Mudclaw, it was some rando kitty. The tree that fell on Mudclaw was just a coincidence, not sent by StarClan, but the cats still saw it as a sign of that. And that it's stated Mudclaw literally strove not to be like Brokenstar or Tigerstar, he hates both of their guts. Onestar was the one who involved other clans in a civil war first, on top of that he literally became everything Tallstar feared, ironically. And Tallstar even admitted to being too stubborn to own up to his mistake, and when he does see Onestar again he beats the tar out of a StarClan cat, smh. Meanwhile, the next time we see Mudclaw, he's preparing and helping in the battle against the Dark Forest. Oh wow, what a horrible cat.
|
|
|
Post by vectoring34 on Apr 27, 2018 21:24:27 GMT -5
Having the right to do something doesn't mean doing it isn't morally bankrupt. Graystripe and Brambleclaw could theoretically have put up their dukes and gotten into a brawl over who should be deputy and both been technically in the right, but that still wouldn't have made it a good thing to do.
Besides, there's a difference between a presumably honorable, 1v1 challenge and selling Windclan to Hawkfrost.
It's one thing to have a character like Ashfur that canon only half heartedly defends. It's another to have one like Mudclaw who gets both that privilege as well as wide spread fandom support for reasons I can't quite understand.
If they were really lying, then challenge Onestar as there is precedent for honor code duels with Longtail and Rusty. It would have been a bit of a jerk thing to do, but I'd understand it. But he doesn't do that. At a guess, I'd think it's because maybe his support in Windclan isn't exactly all that grand(even with two other clans offering support so that it's 3v2, his band got routed pretty quickly and order restored almost immediately).
Something being unfair doesn't give Mudclaw a good reason to go about making conspiracies to try to whip up the support of Windclan.
Manipulating =/= Telling him flat out that you'll help him overthrow his leader in exchange for him helping you overthrow your clan leader. Hawkfrost's terms were bluntly obvious and Mudclaw flat out says he knew them, that's not manipulation. Calling that manipulation is like saying that Darkstripe got manipulated by Tigerstar because of a quid pro quo agreement.
This is entirely irrelevant. He can hate them and still end up being awful. Just take a look at Scourge for an example of someone who hates them both and yet still really shouldn't be near any position of power.
How did Onestar involve them first? I don't see him shepherding other clans into camp to help him run a transfer of power. Also, Onestar's future guilt has absolutely nothing to do with Mudclaw's justification since Mudclaw can't exactly see the future.
Wow, he's fighting against forces that want him dead, clearly this is a cat of immense moral standing. Why in the world is this some kind of stamp of honor on him? Any sane cat would be doing the same thing, because to join the Dark Forest is to basically sign yourself up for a life of general misery and to not fight is offering yourself up on a platter of them. The choice to fight the cats who want to get rid of your nice life in Starclan is abundantly obvious and yet does not reflect on his moral character.
|
|
|
Post by ᏞᎪᎠᎽ Ꮎf fᎪᏁᎠᎾms ミ☆ on Apr 27, 2018 22:03:22 GMT -5
Mudclaw will always be the rightful deputy and leader to me. Since when can a cat with NO LEADERSHIP SKILLS OR EXPERIENCE become LEADER without having served as DEPUTY. That is literally against the code! Who cares if he was "deputy" for like a few seconds before Tallstar died!? ONESTAR DID NOT SERVE AS DEPUTY. Tallstar's word is WRONG and that's part of the reason that code is stupid. It causes too many problems like this where the leader is so old and sick that he is delusional and his "word" goes against the code!
Onewhisker was weak minded because he let Firestar and Brambleclaw PEER PRESSURE HIM into accepting Tallstar's dying wish even though it was clearly against the code! And also, the other big point is, how in the world did Windclan even believe Onewhisker? How did he have ANY supporters? The clan knows who led them during the journey, and that was Mudclaw because Tallstar was too sick and old to lead. How did Onewhisker have anyone on his side when the only other cats that witnessed Tallstar's death were Thunderclan!
The whole topic makes me mad and I hate Onestar so much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Uмвяᴀ on Apr 27, 2018 22:48:27 GMT -5
I have no idea what Tallstar was thinking announcing Onestar as his deputy on his deathbed with the only two witnesses being Firestar, Onestar's friend from another clan, and Brambleclaw, Firestar's former apprentice. I honestly don't blame Mudclaw for thinking Onestar and ThuderClan were conspiring against him.
|
|
|
Post by Rainshadow on Apr 28, 2018 5:35:36 GMT -5
The way I see it, the whole situation could have been avoided if Onewhisker had simply denied Tallstar's wish. There were only three witnesses. If they'd kept quiet, Mudclaw would've become leader and there wouldn't have been a problem. It's impossible to say whether he would have been a good leader or not but at the very least the insurgence wouldn't have happened and WindClan would have most likely known stability.
On the other hand, that does not mean I put the blame on Onestar or that Mudclaw is innocent and in the right. Considering the situation was what it was, aka Onewhisker becoming leader according to Tallstar's wish, Mudclaw shows his bad side by rebelling. Because the thing most important to a leader should be the good of the Clan. Having been deputy, Mudclaw must know this. Yet, how would rebelling against his leader and conspiring with Hawkfrost help his Clan? Instead, if he really thought of his Clan he should have stood by Onestar, advised him, helped him, guided him, and thus allowing him to lead the Clan well. He should've told Hawkfrost 'No' (though I understand it's hard to say no to Hawkfrost ;p) and proven himself the worthy, loyal WindClan warrior he claimed to be. Because there is nothing wrong with ambition but by rebelling in such a way and at such a time he shows he cares more for his own position than the good of his Clan.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 28, 2018 11:53:32 GMT -5
The way I see it, the whole situation could have been avoided if Onewhisker had simply denied Tallstar's wish. There were only three witnesses. If they'd kept quiet, Mudclaw would've become leader and there wouldn't have been a problem. It's impossible to say whether he would have been a good leader or not but at the very least the insurgence wouldn't have happened and WindClan would have most likely known stability. On the other hand, that does not mean I put the blame on Onestar or that Mudclaw is innocent and in the right. Considering the situation was what it was, aka Onewhisker becoming leader according to Tallstar's wish, Mudclaw shows his bad side by rebelling. Because the thing most important to a leader should be the good of the Clan. Having been deputy, Mudclaw must know this. Yet, how would rebelling against his leader and conspiring with Hawkfrost help his Clan? Instead, if he really thought of his Clan he should have stood by Onestar, advised him, helped him, guided him, and thus allowing him to lead the Clan well. He should've told Hawkfrost 'No' (though I understand it's hard to say no to Hawkfrost ;p) and proven himself the worthy, loyal WindClan warrior he claimed to be. Because there is nothing wrong with ambition but by rebelling in such a way and at such a time he shows he cares more for his own position than the good of his Clan. Mudclaw's actions WAS for the good of the clan, he was doing it with them in mind, not just because he rightfully deserved to be leader. Mudclaw served as the deputy, Mudclaw led the cats to their new territory and made sure they got a good piece of land they could defend and call home. Mudclaw was leading the clan when Tallstar couldn't. He had every right to challenge Onestar when the only witnesses was a former kittypet, Firestar, and the son of Tigerstar, whom he's known for hating, both of them were ThunderClan cats at that. Onestar didn't even have the courage to tell WindClan himself and had Firestar do it, he didn't even initially wanted to be leader. He involved help from the outside first, there were no key witnesses to the changes, no other WindClan cats to vouch for Onestar, nothing. And even Bramblestar noted he felt guilty for withholding information about the so-called "ceremony" which wasn't even done properly, they were lying. The only reason Onestar even got leadership at that moment was that his medicine cat backed him up even if they didn't witness the ceremony too. Why should Mudclaw help a cat that didn't even serve as deputy? Onestar has done nothing to earn his respect or the rest of the clan. All he did was act like a coward, he was only even chosen by Tallstar based on his relationship with another Clan. WindClan wants to be independent not locked to the hip with ThunderClan of all cats. The other cats encouraged Mudclaw to rebell, so he did, Hawkfrost offered his help, so he took it. Even ShadowClan cats were supporting him, believing he truly was the rightful leader. Hawkfrost said the same under a guise, he was using Mudclaw while Mudclaw thought his support was genuine. And when Hawkfrost was in hot water for his actions he literally tried to kill Mudclaw while he was telling Bramblestar the truth about his plan. That how the tree fell on both of them, Hawkfrost was chasing Mudclaw down, and Hawkfrost made it out, not Mudclaw. He then used Mudclaw's body, begged forgiveness, and Mudclaw couldn't even defend his own case because he was dead. Even Squirrelflight believed Mudclaw over a snake like Hawkfrost. And as of AVoS, Onestar has even less of a right to be leader when he was running around with a kittypet, and having kits with her. Then neglects her until most of the little dies, and when she begs to for his help again, he denies her just because he fears how the Clan would view him for his disgusting cowardly actions. In the long run, Onestar was a horrible leader, even if Mudclaw had guided him, he still caused the crap that happened with Darktail later down the line. And I still doubt he would have remained friends with Firestar, because if he did, then the cats, along with Mudclaw would still continue to see him as a weak leader. In fact he probably would have just ended up like Rowanstar.
|
|
|
Post by vectoring34 on Apr 28, 2018 14:03:25 GMT -5
I like how everyone just casually brushes aside that Mudclaw was agreeing with Hawkfrost's plan to help him take over Riverclan later. I'm sure that was totally for the good of Windclan. And yep, he's so much better than Onestar and his alliances with Thunderclan as opposed to becoming nothing but Riverclan's attack dog.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2018 16:34:05 GMT -5
Having the right to do something doesn't mean doing it isn't morally bankrupt. Graystripe and Brambleclaw could theoretically have put up their dukes and gotten into a brawl over who should be deputy and both been technically in the right, but that still wouldn't have made it a good thing to do. Besides, there's a difference between a presumably honorable, 1v1 challenge and selling Windclan to Hawkfrost.If they were really lying, then challenge Onestar as there is precedent for honor code duels with Longtail and Rusty. It would have been a bit of a jerk thing to do, but I'd understand it. But he doesn't do that. At a guess, I'd think it's because maybe his support in Windclan isn't exactly all that grand(even with two other clans offering support so that it's 3v2, his band got routed pretty quickly and order restored almost immediately). Something being unfair doesn't give Mudclaw a good reason to go about making conspiracies to try to whip up the support of Windclan. I'd just like to point out two things here: The situation between Greystripe vs Brambleclaw and Onewhisker vs Mudclaw are not comparable. With Thunderclan, it was done as an official ceremony in front of the whole Clan, the leader having time to think it over and with overwhelming witnesses, to confirmed there were no lies. Meanwhile, there were only three witnesses, two which were Thunderclan and Onewhisker himself, cats that would only benefit from it. So it's very suspicious and they could easily of been lying. Even then, Tallstar was dying at the time, so his mental state clearly wouldn't of been good. Also both Greystripe and Brambleclaw both had equal right to the deputy/leader postion. With both having a decent amount of experience with the position. And Brambleclaw was appointed deputy when Greystripe had meaning missing for serval seasons, most likely dead or never return. Meanwhile, Onewhisker becomes deputy when Mudclaw was alive healthy within Windclan and had done nothing wrong. A better comparison to this, is another rebellion, led by Nightstar against Brokenstar. Where he got another Clan involved and sent serval cats into exile, without fair trial. So what's your option on him? And if you think Nightstar had a right to do it, why do you consider Mudclaw so different, to the point he's evil? Onto the other part, Mudclaw did actually want to fight Onewhisker on a 1 v 1, similar to Rusty and Longtail. However, Barkface prevented them from doing it. Here's a video by Pinkbunnygirl, where she reads out the scene directly from the book to prove it: I'll also like to drill in this points again: Mudclaw wasn't doing to this solely out of selfish desires. There were a good portion of Windclan warriors who wanted him to become leader. He fulfilling their wishes. Mudclaw wasn't the only one to fight in that battle. All of Windclan turned on each other. Onewhisker fraught as well in that battle. For all Windclan knew, Onewhisker could of been lying just to make himself Leader.
|
|
|
Post by vectoring34 on Apr 28, 2018 18:21:51 GMT -5
According to the words of Starclan themselves, either choice would have been correct. I'll take in-universe Starclan's word here on the subject of matters relating to the code.
The fact that we're comparing a kitten murdering monster to Onestar really shows how ridiculous this comparison is on the face of it. At worst Onestar was less competent than he should be and soft, he's not evil sent by Starclan.
Anyway, in so far as Nightstar goes, there's several differences anyway. One, Thunderclan was already involved by virtue of their kits being stolen and their medicine cat and deputy being killed. All Nightstar did was just add extra context and position himself to be leader when the ax came down. Second, Nightstar exiled nobody. Blackfoot and co. just ran off with their tails between their legs because they're good and loyal slaves to Brokenstar, there's no implication at all that they were forcibly kicked out against their will. Furthermore, Blackfoot and co. were willing parties to murder and kitten kidnapping, I'd say the judgement is more than fair. Third, Nightstar didn't a promise a thing to Thunderclan in exchange for help. Mudclaw on the other hand rolled over for Hawkfrost and agreed to help him do his own coup in Riverclan(and who knows what Shadowclan wanted in exchange).
If Onestar had murdered kits in Windclan, formed an elite group of guards who abused the clan at will, randomly attacked other clans to murder their cats and steal their kits, and then Hawkfrost wandered into camp as a saving grace, then it'd be comparable. But it's not.
Then ignore him if it really is such a big deal and he really has support.
There were so few Windclan warriors that despite the aid of an additional clan compared to their enemies, they still lost badly. Onestar also had the medicine cat on his side which gives him a heck of a lot more sway among the majority of the clan cats.
Theoretically speaking, maybe.
But you know what? I think that's a far lesser crime than essentially signing over Windclan to Hawkfrost to command as he pleases.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 28, 2018 18:47:41 GMT -5
I like how everyone just casually brushes aside that Mudclaw was agreeing with Hawkfrost's plan to help him take over Riverclan later. I'm sure that was totally for the good of Windclan. And yep, he's so much better than Onestar and his alliances with Thunderclan as opposed to becoming nothing but Riverclan's attack dog. Hawkfrost offered to help Mudclaw because he believed that Mudclaw was the true leader of WindClan, in return Mudclaw agreed that as leader he would leave RiverClan in peace. However, Hawkfrost left out the rest because he was trying to cover his own tracks. Mudclaw told him to tell Bramblestar the truth, which was how Hawkfrost wanted to be WindClan deputy and take over RiverClan later. That was Hawkfrost's plans, he wanted that, and Mudclaw agreed to those negotiations, whether he would have actually gone through with it, we don't know. Tallstar wanted Onestar to lead WindClan and have an alliance with ThunderClan, leading it side by side with Firestar, something he agreed to because it was Tallstar's wish, but later did the extreme opposite. With Mudclaw we don't know, especially considering Hawkfrost revealed that he and Bramblestar are supposed to be the sole rulers of all four clans. Hawkfrost had planned to take WindClan and RiverClan while Bramblestar, ThunderClan and ShadowClan. One way or another that meant Hawkfrost would have to off the leaders, and that includes Mudclaw. While the first leader they went after canonly later on is Firestar, but Bramblestar ruined those plans.
|
|
|
Post by vectoring34 on Apr 28, 2018 22:39:36 GMT -5
No, he agreed to helping him do the same. It wasn't a truce being suggested but a relationship of servitude to Hawkfrost's rebellious whims. “Tell him how you came to me and offered your help if I made you WindClan’s deputy . . . and HELPED you take over RiverClan later.” Not neutrality.
So we just randomly give Mudclaw the benefit of the doubt here?
The fact that Hawkfrost is a traitorous backstabber doesn't help Mudclaw's situation.
|
|
#a3c5e6
Name Colour
𝓣𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓿𝓲𝓮𝓵
Warrior Fanatic
All hail me, the flower-flushing queen of Prague
|
Post by 𝓣𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓿𝓲𝓮𝓵 on Apr 28, 2018 23:25:52 GMT -5
I understand why Mudclaw didn't accept Onewhisker as leader—not only were Firestar and Brambleclaw ThunderClan cats, but Firestar was also Onewhisker's friend, so it makes sense why he'd be suspicious when only three cats, none of whom were Mudclaw or even Barkface, were present. Onewhisker even offered Mudclaw a chance to be his deputy, but he refused. He did however defend Onewhisker at one point, but that clearly didn't last long.
Was Mudclaw the rightful leader? Looking at it at a certain way, yes. It's likely Mudclaw would've just been like Blackstar or Leopardstar if we accept what was said in TUG as canon (as I know alot of people don't because of it's inconsistencies even though that's nothing new for the series), but since the leader's word is the warrior code, Onewhisker was the rightful leader. Tallstar named Onewhisker his successor right before he died, so he technically was deputy for, like, a second before Tallstar died, or more than that if you want to count the time between him being named Mudclaw's replacement and getting nine lives. However, he didn't say the right words. Onewhisker had also previously had two apprentices, so it wasn't like he didn't have any experience leading cats either, which was why that code was created in the first place.
But either way, did Mudclaw have to drag the other Clans into this? And why promise a RiverClan cat to be deputy of WindClan and take over the former later on anyway? It really doesn't help Mudclaw's case either. Hawkfrost clearly manipulated him, but even then, this never sat well with me regardless. It's no better than how Ashfur listened to him, if not worse. Mudclaw could've just challenged Onewhisker himself, or what might've been better is to have Tallstar get Barkface and Mudclaw to bear witness to his decision instead of ThunderClan cats. I'm just surprised more casualties weren't shown after the rebellion.
And Onestar wasn't a good leader, but this doesn't necessarily mean Mudclaw would've been better. He just probably would've been better by comparison, but we don't know for certain and probably never will (again, unless you take TUG as canon, but even then it just says that Mudclaw didn't want to rule through bloodshed), unless Kate says something about it or another guide is released or maybe someone from the Erin Hunter team writes an AU where Mudstar happened or something.
But I think we can all agree on one thing: Harestar is better than both of them.
|
|
|
Post by Moonblazer on Apr 29, 2018 7:18:45 GMT -5
Unpopular opinion here, but I will always prefer Onestar over Mudclaw, and I'm glad Mudclaw didn't become leader. He would have honestly been as bad as Onestar if not worse, so perhaps Tallstar should have chosen a better cat than both of them :/
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2018 8:02:46 GMT -5
Unpopular opinion here, but I will always prefer Onestar over Mudclaw, and I'm glad Mudclaw didn't become leader. He would have honestly been as bad as Onestar if not worse, so perhaps Tallstar should have chosen a better cat than both of them :/ Considering we've never had a statement from the Erins or 'alternate universe' from online oneshots usually written by Vicky, we don't know what Mudclaw would of been like as a leader. So can't really make a fair judgment.
|
|
|
Post by Moonblazer on Apr 29, 2018 8:25:54 GMT -5
Unpopular opinion here, but I will always prefer Onestar over Mudclaw, and I'm glad Mudclaw didn't become leader. He would have honestly been as bad as Onestar if not worse, so perhaps Tallstar should have chosen a better cat than both of them :/ Considering we've never had a statement from the Erins or 'alternate universe' from online oneshots usually written by Vicky, we don't know what Mudclaw would of been like as a leader. So can't really make a fair judgment. But at the time this book came out, the same can be said for Onestar. Nobody knew how he was going to turn out. I made my judgement based off the only evidence we had. But even now, you are right, we can't tell what leader he could have been, but I personally wouldn't have changed anything, because in all honesty we still would have gotten the same problems. Mudclaw and Onestar would have just switched and either one would have wound up being a jerk later in life. It's done and over with, and Onestar voiced his dumb choices and mistakes, and died for it. Mudclaw didn't become leader, that was the point of it really. They clearly intended to make it seem like Onestar would be the best Windclan leader, but changed it later on to add drama to the story. Had it been Mudclaw as leader, him leading attacks on Thunderclan or other clans would have been so predictable and boring with his kind of personality. Because it was Onestar who suddenly changed from a Thunderclan friend to a Thunderclan disliker, it had a more impactful narrative and sense of betrayal. That is much better to me than having Mudclaw, who was clearly a more aggressive cat, I remember his scenes well, be leader, when Onestar was ushered into a position at his dying leader's begging and having a downfall from there. And I'm not arguing here, but I personally find the "Leader's Word is Law" applies here. Tallstar told Onewhisker that he was deputy. He changed it, before Starclan, before witnesses, and before Onewhisker. His word was to change his deputy, and he did. The Deputy code still applies too. Mudclaw no longer has the title of Deputy if his leader literally revokes it. That word is law, at least to me. Does it suck? Sure, I don't care. Starclan gave Onewhisker 9 lives, didn't they? If he was truly unfit to lead, you'd think they'd just not come to him or deny him and say another cat was more rightful. But they didn't. That's my problem with all this.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 29, 2018 15:36:59 GMT -5
Mudclaw, unlike Onewhisker at the time, had nothing to prove. Mudclaw was said to be the most senior warrior at the time, is already an experienced deputy, is downright dedicated to his clan, and loyal. He even says to Tallstar at one point that WindClan's priorities must come first. And yes he's known to hold a grudge but his grudges make sense. He hated Brokenstar for driving his Clan out and murdering his clanmates, he hated ThunderClan for sheltering that very same cat, he hated Tigerstar as well and strove not to be like them in the long run. He had no ties with ThunerClan whatsoever, he would have easily been an independent leader, away from them, and give WindClan cats a strong name. If anything he'd be an alternative version of Leopardstar or Blackstar. Cats that make mistakes, but its the minor thing about their characters and they make up for it asap.
On the other hand, Onewhisker was cowardly. He was too buddy-buddy with ThunderClan cats, he needed to reevaluate where his loyalty lies. Unfortunately, it took him becoming a leader to realize that, and it was a bit too late at that point. The only reason Tallstar chose Onewhisker was not that he had leadership qualities, but because of his way-too close of a bond he had with Firestar(who is ironically the son of his past love interest) there was some really heavy bias in his choice and is overall foolish.
The leader's word is law is an abomination of a code considering this is how we got cats like Tigerstar and Brokenstar in power, and how so much crap follows through. No, just because Onestar got 9 lives doesn't mean anything, so did Tiger and Broken, and they've murdered plenty of cats unjustly in their greed to be powerful. If anything Onestar only got 9 lives by default, just because Mudclaw died, there are not many options after that. Tallstar also did not use the proper ceremony to make Onestar leader, ThunderCLan also withheld that information out of bias. There were no witnesses, not even the medicine cat was present.
Onestar led an attack on ThunderClan because he was trying to prove a point. He stole from them, not the first time either, hid away when TC wanted to confront him, then launched an attack on TC in the middle of the night. One of the most cowardly things a leader could do next to attacking other clans at a gathering. He not only spat on Firestar's friendship but also Tallstar's last wishes. Then has RiverClan try and help him chase out ThunderClan from their own territory, trying to do exactly what Brokenstar did with them before. People rag on Mudclaw for accepting offered help from other clans, but no one says a thing about how Onestar enlist RiverClan to try and get rid of ThunderClan? And up to this point, ThunderClan has done nothing to WindClan, except help them, this was an unprovoked, an unjustified attack, just so Onestar can seem "worthy" in the eyes of his cats.
The next time Onestar even meets Tallstar, he attacks him, a StarClan cat, and then pretty much confirms again he never wanted to be leader. Then why? Why accept it??? Why didn't he just keep his mouth shut, or step down when Mudclaw challenged him initially??? He was never suited to be leader. Tallstar even admits being too stubborn to change his mind even though he was wrong.
And then just when you think it can't get any worse, we find out that as of AVoS he had an illegitimate child with a kittypet. Seriously? He gets friendly with kittypets during his warrior-ship, fooling around with them, gets one pregnant, and when she wants him to take responsibility he refuses. That honestly makes him just as bad as Crowfeather, if not worse in my book. She ends up kitting alone, loses all but one kit, and then again begs him to at least take and raise their kit, but again he refuses. Not because he worried for his safety, but because he was too scared of how Tallstar would see him and the rest of his clan. He is a coward. Always was, always has been. Which is why I wasn't all too surprised when it was revealed he was Darktail's father.
The leader's word is law right? Kestrelflight and Harespring went against Onestar's word to save a clan that was going to die out due to Onestar's selfishness. Onestar was literally going to let ShadowClan suffer, let cats die, all because he wanted to cover up his mistakes, like a coward. He tried to make Rowanstar do his own dirty work, and was so scared to face Darktail he ran off during a battle and even refuse to help the other clans fight at one point. Onestar is honestly one of the reasons for Rowanstar's fall as a leader as well. Harestar broke the rules for the right reason, this is why Harestar is becoming so popular and well liked by fans and in the books. He did the right thing, he saved ShadowClan when they needed them when Onestar couldn't own up to his own actions. But at that point, the damage is already done.
Onestar died for his cowardice. Not for his heroics.
Mudclaw had no affiliation with kittypets. No close ties with ThunderClan. Nothing to prove because he already earned the respect of his clanmates. Mudclaw was ambitious to make WindClan amazing again and save it from the downward spiral it was going, but never got the chance because it was stolen from him by a more inexperienced irresponsible cowardly furball.
I pray to StarClan that Harestar continues doing what he's doing because the only reason I haven't lost respect for WindClan at the moment is because of him, and how badly ShadowClan has been as well by comparison. I don't like Tigerheart, and I don't think he deserves to be leader, but I hope he ends up being a good one in comparison to his father as well. Even though it should have been Tawnypelt.
|
|
|
Post by Moonblazer on Apr 29, 2018 18:54:32 GMT -5
Maple, I love you, but you're not getting what I'm saying.
Duh. Onewhisker/Star was a coward. That's not my point. My point is, the reason they made Onestar leader was to have a greater impact when he eventually spat in Thunderclan's face. What kind of story would we have with a cat like Mudclaw? The same kind of story we get over and over with Leopardstar, Blackstar, ect. Super loyal slighty aggressive senior warrior becomes leader and leads his clan to "greatness" which even then he would have only boosted Hawkfrost's power and screwed over the clans with another Tigerstar anyway.
Should Mudclaw have been leader? Sure, I have no idea, it's done and over with and not something I dwell on, but I do know that when comparing Onestar with Mudclaw, the cat that attacks Thunderclan, which I could really easily see Mudclaw doing anyway, that would pull a more emotional response from me is Onestar.
That's why I prefer him and actually appreciate his character. He's a big freakin coward who tried way too hard to fill pawprints that he probably shouldn't have. But that makes a far more interesting leadership for me than snappy old Mudclaw.
I mean, I seriously think Windclan would have had a jerk leader either way. I seriously doubt anything would change if Mudclaw was leader, but it would just be more predicatble and expected. Windclan being super against Thunderclan? Woah, Mudstar, what a surprise and a scandal. Nah. But because it was Onestar, who accepted leadership only to stomp on Tallstar and Thunderclan? That made me deliciously conflicted and upset, and that's better in my opinion.
I know im in the minority here, and my stance is hard to explain, but Onestar is supposed to envoke rage and conflict, and while I'd prefer Darktail to be Blackstar's son, I actually liked the plot twist there with Onestar and Darktail, and have enjoyed seeing Windclan's fall and slow rise now in AVOS.
|
|
|
Post by Moonblazer on Apr 29, 2018 18:56:29 GMT -5
Not to mention i also disagree with Leader's Word is Law, but that is also not my point. How I feel does not matter with a canon code. It sucks, but that's the way it is. Tallstar chose Onewhisker as his deputu and revoked Mudclaw. Now the deputy code comes in play for Onewhisker, because the leader chooses the deputy, and I see no reason why Tallstar can't change his deputy. :/
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 29, 2018 19:00:39 GMT -5
Maple, I love you, but you're not getting what I'm saying. Duh. Onewhisker/Star was a coward. That's not my point. My point is, the reason they made Onestar leader was to have a greater impact when he eventually spat in Thunderclan's face. What kind of story would we have with a cat like Mudclaw? The same kind of story we get over and over with Leopardstar, Blackstar, ect. Super loyal slighty aggressive senior warrior becomes leader and leads his clan to "greatness" which even then he would have only boosted Hawkfrost's power and screwed over the clans with another Tigerstar anyway. Should Mudclaw have been leader? Sure, I have no idea, it's done and over with and not something I dwell on, but I do know that when comparing Onestar with Mudclaw, the cat that attacks Thunderclan, which I could really easily see Mudclaw doing anyway, that would pull a more emotional response from me is Onestar. That's why I prefer him and actually appreciate his character. He's a big freakin coward who tried way too hard to fill pawprints that he probably shouldn't have. But that makes a far more interesting leadership for me than snappy old Mudclaw. I mean, I seriously think Windclan would have had a jerk leader either way. I seriously doubt anything would change if Mudclaw was leader, but it would just be more predicatble and expected. Windclan being super against Thunderclan? Woah, Mudstar, what a surprise and a scandal. Nah. But because it was Onestar, who accepted leadership only to stomp on Tallstar and Thunderclan? That made me deliciously conflicted and upset, and that's better in my opinion. I know im in the minority here, and my stance is hard to explain, but Onestar is supposed to envoke rage and conflict, and while I'd prefer Darktail to be Blackstar's son, I actually liked the plot twist there with Onestar and Darktail, and have enjoyed seeing Windclan's fall and slow rise now in AVOS. So basically you like it for the drama?
|
|
|
Post by Moonblazer on Apr 29, 2018 19:04:38 GMT -5
Maple, I love you, but you're not getting what I'm saying. Duh. Onewhisker/Star was a coward. That's not my point. My point is, the reason they made Onestar leader was to have a greater impact when he eventually spat in Thunderclan's face. What kind of story would we have with a cat like Mudclaw? The same kind of story we get over and over with Leopardstar, Blackstar, ect. Super loyal slighty aggressive senior warrior becomes leader and leads his clan to "greatness" which even then he would have only boosted Hawkfrost's power and screwed over the clans with another Tigerstar anyway. Should Mudclaw have been leader? Sure, I have no idea, it's done and over with and not something I dwell on, but I do know that when comparing Onestar with Mudclaw, the cat that attacks Thunderclan, which I could really easily see Mudclaw doing anyway, that would pull a more emotional response from me is Onestar. That's why I prefer him and actually appreciate his character. He's a big freakin coward who tried way too hard to fill pawprints that he probably shouldn't have. But that makes a far more interesting leadership for me than snappy old Mudclaw. I mean, I seriously think Windclan would have had a jerk leader either way. I seriously doubt anything would change if Mudclaw was leader, but it would just be more predicatble and expected. Windclan being super against Thunderclan? Woah, Mudstar, what a surprise and a scandal. Nah. But because it was Onestar, who accepted leadership only to stomp on Tallstar and Thunderclan? That made me deliciously conflicted and upset, and that's better in my opinion. I know im in the minority here, and my stance is hard to explain, but Onestar is supposed to envoke rage and conflict, and while I'd prefer Darktail to be Blackstar's son, I actually liked the plot twist there with Onestar and Darktail, and have enjoyed seeing Windclan's fall and slow rise now in AVOS. So basically you like it for the drama? In this case? Absolutely. I usually choose between Drama and Righteousness on many things, and the Onestar Mudclaw thing is totally a drama thing for me. Both cats are clearly flawed and not "ideal heroic, peaceful and wise" leader stereotypes that tend to be the best leaders, but Onestar is more complex than Mudclaw, so I get drawn to his actions more. This is a reason I want a Berrystar in Thunderclan. To break the chain of "heroic, calm and collected" Thunderclan leaders and provide good and unpredictable drama for the clan.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 29, 2018 19:25:43 GMT -5
So basically you like it for the drama? In this case? Absolutely. I usually choose between Drama and Righteousness on many things, and the Onestar Mudclaw thing is totally a drama thing for me. Both cats are clearly flawed and not "ideal heroic, peaceful and wise" leader stereotypes that tend to be the best leaders, but Onestar is more complex than Mudclaw, so I get drawn to his actions more. This is a reason I want a Berrystar in Thunderclan. To break the chain of "heroic, calm and collected" Thunderclan leaders and provide good and unpredictable drama for the clan. I get ya, I actually feel the same way with Hollyleaf dropping the drama bomb during the gathering. I hate Crow's guts, and I don't think Leafpool should have gotten with him *rolls eyes* but that moment at the gathering was downright crazy drama fantastic lol.
|
|
|
Post by Moonblazer on Apr 29, 2018 19:27:02 GMT -5
In this case? Absolutely. I usually choose between Drama and Righteousness on many things, and the Onestar Mudclaw thing is totally a drama thing for me. Both cats are clearly flawed and not "ideal heroic, peaceful and wise" leader stereotypes that tend to be the best leaders, but Onestar is more complex than Mudclaw, so I get drawn to his actions more. This is a reason I want a Berrystar in Thunderclan. To break the chain of "heroic, calm and collected" Thunderclan leaders and provide good and unpredictable drama for the clan. I get ya, I actually feel the same way with Hollyleaf dropping the drama bomb during the gathering. I hate Crow's guts, and I don't think Leafpool should have gotten with him *rolls eyes* but that moment at the gathering was downright crazy drama fantastic lol. While I dislike Hollyleaf for it, I do agree! That gathering was intense!
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Apr 29, 2018 19:32:06 GMT -5
I get ya, I actually feel the same way with Hollyleaf dropping the drama bomb during the gathering. I hate Crow's guts, and I don't think Leafpool should have gotten with him *rolls eyes* but that moment at the gathering was downright crazy drama fantastic lol. While I dislike Hollyleaf for it, I do agree! That gathering was intense! Admittedly I think Darktail is a fantastic villain but that's probably because Onestar is such a bad one. The drama Darktail cause probably wouldn't have happened if not for Onestar's dumb actions, but it gave birth to one of the best villains in the series. It's a shame he died so soon.
|
|