|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2016 19:02:26 GMT -5
There arent that many strong female characters in Warriors. List down which characters that were female you thought were pretty strong and aren't afraid to defend themselves.
I would say Squirrelflight and Ivypool.
|
|
|
Post by nem on Oct 7, 2016 19:11:55 GMT -5
Gorsetail. <3
And especially my daughter, Sedgewhisker.
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 19:14:42 GMT -5
Ivypool is the weakest character in the series.
Bluestar, Sandstorm, Squirrelflight, Ferncloud, Hollyleaf, Tall Shadow, Wind Runner, Turtle Tail, Briarlighht, and as much as I hate to say it, Leafpool are strong women
Warriors isn't lacking in powerful women. It does a have a variety of different types of women, though.
|
|
Bisexual
#ffc5c5
Official Queen of Fan Clans
Name Colour
ʀᴀɪɴʟᴇᴀғ 🍁
Official ThunderClan & ElmClan Leader
Easing back in
|
Post by ʀᴀɪɴʟᴇᴀғ 🍁 on Oct 7, 2016 19:30:28 GMT -5
Doestar, Bluestar, Willowpelt, Speckletail, Frostfur, Goldenflower, Ferncloud, Sandstorm, Sorreltail, Leopardstar, Mistystar, Wind Runner, Tall Shadow, Squirrelflight, Hollyleaf, Ivypool, Sedgewhisker, Tawnypelt, Gorsetail, Ashfoot, Morningflower, and Swiftbreeze.
|
|
|
Post by 𝕡𝕖𝕡𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕞𝕚𝕟𝕥 on Oct 7, 2016 19:47:39 GMT -5
Pretty much all of the Clan women are competent, even the full time queens, elders, and medicine cats.
I'd say the strongest is Ivypool, since she's an interesting, flawed anti-hero who kicks butt, and actually works for her strength
|
|
|
Post by Soαrιɴɢ Bloѕѕoмѕ ✿ on Oct 7, 2016 20:20:41 GMT -5
How would you define a strong female character?
Strong as in well-developed? Then I'd argue: Bluestar, Yellowfang, Cinderpelt, Sandstorm, Brightheart, Goldenflower, Leafstar, Mistystar, Squirrelflight, Leafpool, Daisy, Millie, Ferncloud, Hollyleaf, Briarlight, Twigpaw, Violetpaw, Needletail, and those are just off the top of my head.
Strong as in physically strong? Then I'd counter with the assertion that every she-cat in the clans are trained in fighting techniques, even the permanent queens, and are well-versed in combat, with the exceptions being Daisy and Briarlight, for obvious reasons.
Strong as in independent? Then I'd offer: Bluestar, Yellowfang, Cinderpelt, Sandstorm, Brightheart, Speckletail, Goldenflower, Mistystar, Squirrelflight, Leafpool, Mothwing, Russetfur, Millie, Hollyleaf, Needletail, Willowshine, and many others.
I think Warriors is a series who doesn't have to worry about it's number of strong female characters. In fact, I'd argue that it has the most diverse cast of "strong" female characters, especially considering the fact that the current series has 3/4 of its main characters be female, and one of those 3 is an anti-hero (maybe even a villain).
|
|
|
Post by pastelpills on Oct 7, 2016 20:58:07 GMT -5
Ivypool is the weakest character in the series. Bluestar, Sandstorm, Squirrelflight, Ferncloud, Hollyleaf, Tall Shadow, Wind Runner, Turtle Tail, Briarlighht, and as much as I hate to say it, Leafpool are strong women Warriors isn't lacking in powerful women. It does a have a variety of different types of women, though. Why do you think Ivypool is weak? To me she seems very strong cat.
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 21:08:51 GMT -5
Ivypool is the weakest character in the series. Bluestar, Sandstorm, Squirrelflight, Ferncloud, Hollyleaf, Tall Shadow, Wind Runner, Turtle Tail, Briarlighht, and as much as I hate to say it, Leafpool are strong women Warriors isn't lacking in powerful women. It does a have a variety of different types of women, though. Why do you think Ivypool is weak? To me she seems very strong cat. did you ever read ivyfool on the old forums?
|
|
|
Post by nem on Oct 7, 2016 21:12:18 GMT -5
Why do you think Ivypool is weak? To me she seems very strong cat. did you ever read ivyfool on the old forums? I found it for you.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 21:23:16 GMT -5
I'm not gonna bother reading that, but when you find another she-cat that can take on two fully grown savage toms, 2 on 1, and win, then come back to me.
|
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 21:24:20 GMT -5
I'm not gonna bother reading that, but when you find another she-cat that can take on two fully grown savage toms, 2 on 1, and win, then come back to me. I think Hollyleaf did
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 21:25:17 GMT -5
I'm not gonna bother reading that, but when you find another she-cat that can take on two fully grown savage toms, 2 on 1, and win, then come back to me. I think Hollyleaf did Lol, when? And personally I like Hollyleaf too, but I didn't like the mess with Fallen Leaves, it was unnecessary imo.
|
|
|
Post by nem on Oct 7, 2016 21:26:51 GMT -5
I'm not gonna bother reading that, but when you find another she-cat that can take on two fully grown savage toms, 2 on 1, and win, then come back to me. To summarize it for you: Ivypool is a bland character with few distinguishing traits. She's cheap- easy to make. Her plot is cliche and poorly written. You can just read the last paragraph and understand what all of it is.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 21:33:58 GMT -5
I'm not gonna bother reading that, but when you find another she-cat that can take on two fully grown savage toms, 2 on 1, and win, then come back to me. To summarize it for you: Ivypool is a bland character with few distinguishing traits. She's cheap- easy to make. Her plot is cliche and poorly written. You can just read the last paragraph and understand what all of it is. oOoooOORRrr, people just perceive things differently, thus this is all just the op's opinions, and everyone that reads Ivypool's story will either disagree or agree, and have their own opinions as well. And it just happened to be that the majority likes her character and her development, including me. Pretty simple. You think she's bland? Opinion. You think she has a few distinguishing traits? Opinion. You thinks she's cheap and easy to make, again opinion. You think her plot is cliche and poorly written, well you guessed it, opinion. Just because you have an opinion, doesn't make you right.
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 21:36:53 GMT -5
To summarize it for you: Ivypool is a bland character with few distinguishing traits. She's cheap- easy to make. Her plot is cliche and poorly written. You can just read the last paragraph and understand what all of it is. oOoooOORRrr, people just perceive things differently, thus this is all just the op's opinions, and everyone that reads Ivypool's story will either disagree or agree, and have their own opinions as well. And it just happened to be that the majority likes her character and her development, including me. Pretty simple. You think she's bland? Opinion. You think she has a few distinguishing traits? Opinion. You thinks she's cheap and easy to make, again opinion. You think her plot is cliche and poorly written, well you guessed it, opinion. Just because you have an opinion, doesn't make you right. its an opinion till you back it up with fact. Then it turns into a thesis. And the essay has that.
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 21:37:44 GMT -5
I'm not gonna bother reading that, but when you find another she-cat that can take on two fully grown savage toms, 2 on 1, and win, then come back to me. I think Hollyleaf did In the last hope i think she fought Hawkfrost and some other anon simultaneously before being fatally wounded.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 21:39:54 GMT -5
oOoooOORRrr, people just perceive things differently, thus this is all just the op's opinions, and everyone that reads Ivypool's story will either disagree or agree, and have their own opinions as well. And it just happened to be that the majority likes her character and her development, including me. Pretty simple. You think she's bland? Opinion. You think she has a few distinguishing traits? Opinion. You thinks she's cheap and easy to make, again opinion. You think her plot is cliche and poorly written, well you guessed it, opinion. Just because you have an opinion, doesn't make you right. its an opinion till you back it up with fact. Then it turns into a thesis. And the essay has that. No, it doesn't. I'm not seeing a single quote in there for one, lol. Also again, how people perceive certain things will differ, hence different opinions. Unless you actually do use factual evidence, then no it's not facts. Like saying Ivypool is a "she-cat" and then using a quote from the books to prove just that, then yes that's fact. Otherwise, all of that, like I said, is opinions based their own perception of the story toward Ivypool. So....
|
|
|
Post by nem on Oct 7, 2016 21:40:36 GMT -5
To summarize it for you: Ivypool is a bland character with few distinguishing traits. She's cheap- easy to make. Her plot is cliche and poorly written. You can just read the last paragraph and understand what all of it is. oOoooOORRrr, people just perceive things differently, thus this is all just the op's opinions, and everyone that reads Ivypool's story will either disagree or agree, and have their own opinions as well. And it just happened to be that the majority likes her character and her development, including me. Pretty simple. You think she's bland? Opinion. You think she has a few distinguishing traits? Opinion. You thinks she's cheap and easy to make, again opinion. You think her plot is cliche and poorly written, well you guessed it, opinion. Just because you have an opinion, doesn't make you right. That isn't my opinion by the way.
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 21:45:17 GMT -5
its an opinion till you back it up with fact. Then it turns into a thesis. And the essay has that. No, it doesn't. I'm not seeing a single quote in there for one, lol. Also again, how people perceive certain things will differ, hence different opinions. Unless you actually do use factual evidence, then no it's not facts. Like saying Ivypool is a "she-cat" and then using a quote from the books to prove just that, then yes that's fact. Otherwise, all of that, like I said, is opinions based their own perception of the story toward Ivypool. So.... Ever heard of the term paraphrase? I don't write like other people here. My essays are not half quote. I can summarize scenes and plots and still keep the essay's integrity.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 21:47:13 GMT -5
In the last hope i think she fought Hawkfrost and some other anon simultaneously before being fatally wounded. Nope. It was 3 on 1, until Hollyleaf showed up, and helped out Ivypool. While she fought Thistle and Snow, Holly was fighting Hawk, but lost, while Ivy sent Thistle and Snow packing.
|
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 21:51:29 GMT -5
No, it doesn't. I'm not seeing a single quote in there for one, lol. Also again, how people perceive certain things will differ, hence different opinions. Unless you actually do use factual evidence, then no it's not facts. Like saying Ivypool is a "she-cat" and then using a quote from the books to prove just that, then yes that's fact. Otherwise, all of that, like I said, is opinions based their own perception of the story toward Ivypool. So.... Ever heard of the term paraphrase? I don't write like other people here. My essays are not half quote. I can summarize scenes and plots and still keep the essay's integrity. Except you didn't paraphrase either. Your entire essay is dripping with bias and opinion, I'm literally going through it right now. And yes, I know what paraphrasing is, I also know what summarizing is as well. I'm pretty sure as a person 3 years into college, who has to constantly do APH format essays, I know what both of those terms apply to. There's a difference between paraphrasing and summarizing by the way. Paraphrasing is rewording and shortening work from another source, you're not changing the facts you're just rewording it, while summarizing is putting main ideas into your own words, applying your opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2016 21:54:33 GMT -5
Too many to list imo.
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 22:03:26 GMT -5
Ever heard of the term paraphrase? I don't write like other people here. My essays are not half quote. I can summarize scenes and plots and still keep the essay's integrity. Except you didn't paraphrase either. Your entire essay is dripping with bias and opinion, I'm literally going through it right now. And yes, I know what paraphrasing is, I also know what summarizing is as well. I'm pretty sure as a person 3 years into college, who has to constantly do APH format essays, I know what both of those terms apply to. There's a difference between paraphrasing and summarizing by the way. Paraphrasing is rewording and shortening work from another source, you're not changing the facts you're just rewording it, while summarizing is putting main ideas into your own words, applying your opinion. The sentences describing what happened in the book are placed next to sentences that are opinion. But that doesn't take away from their credibility. Is my description of how Ivypool entered the Dark Forest wrong? Is my description of how other characters reacted to Ivypool's behavior wrong? Is Ivypool's poor arguing ability not true? Am I wrong when I say Ivypool failed to pass on information to the three for three books? Am I wrong when I say the Dark Forest has no continuity because oots dark forest does not resemble the dark forest we see in other books and said other books don't match each other? Am I wrong when I say the dark forest has few fleshed out characters?
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 22:26:08 GMT -5
Except you didn't paraphrase either. Your entire essay is dripping with bias and opinion, I'm literally going through it right now. And yes, I know what paraphrasing is, I also know what summarizing is as well. I'm pretty sure as a person 3 years into college, who has to constantly do APH format essays, I know what both of those terms apply to. There's a difference between paraphrasing and summarizing by the way. Paraphrasing is rewording and shortening work from another source, you're not changing the facts you're just rewording it, while summarizing is putting main ideas into your own words, applying your opinion. The sentences describing what happened in the book are placed next to sentences that are opinion. But that doesn't take away from their credibility. Is my description of how Ivypool entered the Dark Forest wrong? Is my description of how other characters reacted to Ivypool's behavior wrong? Is Ivypool's poor arguing ability not true? Am I wrong when I say Ivypool failed to pass on information to the three for three books? Am I wrong when I say the Dark Forest has no continuity because oots dark forest does not resemble the dark forest we see in other books and said other books don't match each other? Am I wrong when I say the dark forest has few fleshed out characters? You're using certain words that are opinionated you do know that right? Like when you claim her argument is "poor" someone else can say it's "understandable". My point is that your "essay" isn't 100% credible, and is mostly opinions based off what you've read. It's still opinions nonetheless, and when you're talking about certain things like, Ivypool entering the Dark Forest, of course that is fact, and is considered paraphrasing, but it's not being written in the correct format. You're mixing your opinion too much into this essay, and it's overshadowing actual facts. Just because you're going based off what you read, doesn't mean your essay can be considered credible as a whole, let alone at all. It's literally just your opinion Ivypool about things that happened, and even then you're still in certain your opinion like, "Am I wrong when I say the dark forest has few fleshed out characters?" that, again, is your opinion, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Basement Cat on Oct 7, 2016 22:40:17 GMT -5
I thought Hollyleaf fought off Hawkfrost while mortally wounded. She took the blow for Ivypool before she fought Hawkfrost. This means she wasn't at her full potential while fighting Hawkfrost, and she still made him run off. Not to mention she scared off a fox, and developed her own fighting moved.
|
|
Holly Snow
My full names are Hollyleaf;) and Snowwing™
|
Post by Holly Snow on Oct 7, 2016 22:40:54 GMT -5
The sentences describing what happened in the book are placed next to sentences that are opinion. But that doesn't take away from their credibility. Is my description of how Ivypool entered the Dark Forest wrong? Is my description of how other characters reacted to Ivypool's behavior wrong? Is Ivypool's poor arguing ability not true? Am I wrong when I say Ivypool failed to pass on information to the three for three books? Am I wrong when I say the Dark Forest has no continuity because oots dark forest does not resemble the dark forest we see in other books and said other books don't match each other? Am I wrong when I say the dark forest has few fleshed out characters? You're using certain words that are opinionated you do know that right? Like when you claim her argument is "poor" someone else can say it's "understandable". My point is that your "essay" isn't 100% credible, and is mostly opinions based off what you've read. It's still opinions nonetheless, and when you're talking about certain things like, Ivypool entering the Dark Forest, of course that is fact, and is considered paraphrasing, but it's not being written in the correct format. You're mixing your opinion too much into this essay, and it's overshadowing actual facts. Just because you're going based off what you read, doesn't mean your essay can be considered credible as a whole, let alone at all. It's literally just your opinion Ivypool about things that happened, and even then you're still in certain your opinion like, "Am I wrong when I say the dark forest has few fleshed out characters?" that, again, is your opinion, lol. My opinion is that I don't like Ivypool. That leeches into my writing. However she isn't the first character I've called badly written. On this site I have a Cinderheart essay about how Cinderheart is a bad charachter. By the looks of it it would look like I hate cinderheart. I actually adore her. I can still recognize her faults though. The claim of my Ivyfool essay is that Ivypool is an objectively bad character. If you want to prove me not credible why don't you counter me?
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 23:03:10 GMT -5
You're using certain words that are opinionated you do know that right? Like when you claim her argument is "poor" someone else can say it's "understandable". My point is that your "essay" isn't 100% credible, and is mostly opinions based off what you've read. It's still opinions nonetheless, and when you're talking about certain things like, Ivypool entering the Dark Forest, of course that is fact, and is considered paraphrasing, but it's not being written in the correct format. You're mixing your opinion too much into this essay, and it's overshadowing actual facts. Just because you're going based off what you read, doesn't mean your essay can be considered credible as a whole, let alone at all. It's literally just your opinion Ivypool about things that happened, and even then you're still in certain your opinion like, "Am I wrong when I say the dark forest has few fleshed out characters?" that, again, is your opinion, lol. My opinion is that I don't like Ivypool. That leeches into my writing. However she isn't the first character I've called badly written. On this site I have a Cinderheart essay about how Cinderheart is a bad charachter. By the looks of it it would look like I hate cinderheart. I actually adore her. I can still recognize her faults though. The claim of my Ivyfool essay is that Ivypool is an objectively bad character. If you want to prove me not credible why don't you counter me? I'm going to be blunt, I've refute a ton of essays, a sh*t ton, and I'm honestly not in the mood to refute every little line in your essay. It's possible yes, but do I have the motivation and do I think it's worth my time? No. Not exactly. Especially when it's mostly your opinion anyways. You're free to your own opinion, also character criticism is still opinionated. I'm perfectly aware that you can like a character but still have qualms about them and their development. Simple, lol. Your opinion is still just your opinion, while my opinion is that I disagree with yours, and I personally like Ivypool and I think she's developed just fine. And that doesn't seem like it's gonna change. So we should just agree to disagree. I don't find your opinion credible, and if I do decide to refute it one day, I will, I'm just not in the mood to attempt it at 12am especially when I have work in 6 hours, lol.
|
|
|
Post by ❅Maplefrost❅ on Oct 7, 2016 23:18:29 GMT -5
I thought Hollyleaf fought off Hawkfrost while mortally wounded. She took the blow for Ivypool before she fought Hawkfrost. This means she wasn't at her full potential while fighting Hawkfrost, and she still made him run off. Not to mention she scared off a fox, and developed her own fighting moved. No, Hollyleaf was mortally wounded while fighting Hawkfrost, he's the one that did it, and it led to her death. Meanwhile Ivypool was fighting both Thistleclaw and Snowtuft. However, the information you did get is from the Ultimate Guide, which honestly isn't very credible, it has a lot of errors. The Ultimate Guide says that Hollyleaf jumped in front of Ivypool to protect her from Hawkfrost's strike. While in the book, as I quoted above, Hollyleaf actually slammed into Hawkfrost.
|
|