|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2020 12:37:24 GMT -5
Is there a book or information in the series that isn’t canon? I read Redtail’s Debt and it says he killed Oakheart, but in TPB, it’s said that the RiverClan Warrior was killed by falling rocks. Which one is true? Unless it was a lie that Oakheart was killed that way.
How do you feel about books or information in the stories being non canon? I honestly don’t like it because it’s confusing what is real and what’s not. It’s especially frustrating with many book errors mentioning dead cats and so forth.
|
|
|
Post by Batchaser on May 25, 2020 12:42:14 GMT -5
I don’t know if the authors consider it non-canon, but I know the community does not accept Spottedleaf’s Heart and a lot of people do not consider it canon.
|
|
|
Post by Hollyfall on May 25, 2020 13:13:33 GMT -5
This series is notoriously inconsistent, and I'm pretty much certain that everyone's annoyed by these inconsistencies. Case and point with Redtail's Debt. Redtail killing Oakheart goes against the one of the foundational aspects of the first arc, that Oakheart was killed by a rockfall, and Redtail did not kill him as Tigerclaw claimed. Or something like Beetlewhisker somehow coming back from the dead for several books despite dying in The Last Hope and his death being of reasonably major importance. However, he later appeared in the allegiances during AVOS, made a physical appearance at one point, and even given his own apprentice. I know Kate was pretty annoyed by this too.
Sometimes, inconsistencies are good if you're using the plot device of the unreliable narrator, but Warriors doesn't exactly use that. It's frustrating because some of the inconsistencies are blatantly obvious to us, but sometimes the books treat it like it's fact.
|
|
|